Save up to 20% on multi-case orders
15% off 3+ cases, 19%+ off 10+
In the light of the recent report of recycling rates falling for the first time in England from 44.8% in 2014 to 43.9% in 2015, one wonders how sustainable is this, one of the main eco-friendly ways of dealing with waste. Have we reached our peak of this sustainable effort?
No doubt, recycling helps the environment, if done correctly and the momentum is maintained.
Why is the effort seemingly non-sustainable?
The reality is that the survival of the recycling movement depends on continual subsidies, sermons and policing.
The problems and obstacles facing recycling as a sustainable solution are:
We need to ask ourselves: What is the goal here?
To offset the greenhouse impact of one passenger’s round-trip flight between New York and London, we’d have to recycle roughly 40,000 plastic bottles, assuming we fly coach. If we sit in business or first-class, where each passenger takes up more space, it could be more like 100,000!
The chief benefit of recycling is no doubt the reduction of carbon emissions and the greenhouse gases as we reduce the need to manufacture new products, hence less mining, drilling and logging.
But how much difference does it make? Here’s some perspective
According to the Environmental Protection Agency’s estimates, more than 90 percent reduction in greenhouse gases come from just a few materials - paper, cardboard and metals like the aluminium in soda cans. Recycling one ton of metal or paper saves about three tons of carbon dioxide while recycling one ton of plastic saves only slightly more than one ton of carbon dioxide. A ton of food saves a little less than a ton. For glass, you have to recycle three tons in order to get about one ton of greenhouse benefits and it takes 20 tons of yard waste to save a single ton of carbon dioxide
We can accomplish more by sorting paper and aluminium cans than by worrying about yogurt containers and half-eaten dinners!
So how can we really build a sustainable community with a strategy that can’t even sustain itself? What is the solution? Would a simpler disposing of products that will biodegrade in a landfill be more sustainable? One example of such a product is Element tableware.
Element is made from cornstarch and yam. It is 100% biodegradable and hence one does not have to worry about which recycling bin to put it in. It is disposed off into your normal waste heading for the landfill.
It has the following attributes:
{"one"=>"Select 2 or 3 items to compare", "other"=>"{{ count }} of 3 items selected"}